British Archaeology banner

Cover of British Archaeology Issue 64

Issue 64

April 2002

Contents

news

Anglo-Saxon 'planned town' revealed this month in Whitby

Mesolithic camp found at bottom of the Solent

Sacred pool ringed by toem poles in Scotland's ritual glen

Prehistoric bunker guards its secrets to the very end

Finds from Chester: an elephant's leg to Jupiter's face

In Brief

features

Guns of the Armada
Colin Martin on the results of excavating Armada wrecks

Invisible Vikings
Dawn Hadley on how the Danish settlers became English

Great sites
Peter Rowley-Conwy on the Neolithic house at Balbridie

letters

On Roulston Scar, small finds, grave goods and boiled bones

issues

George Lambrick on new developments at Stonehenge

Peter Ellis

Regular column

books

Dangerous Energy by Wayne Cocroft

Bloody Marsh by Peter Warner

Vernacular Buildings in a Changing World edited by Sarah Pearson & Bob Meeson

Dying for the Gods by Miranda Aldhouse Green

The Vikings in Wales by Mark Redknap

CBA update

favourite finds

Gwilym Hughes on a piece of Ming china found in Africa

 

ISSN 1357-4442

Editor Simon Denison

issues

A Stonehenge for the new millennium

Plans for improving Stonehenge are still far from complete, warns George Lambrick

It is said that every generation gets the Stonehenge it deserves. For the last decade plans have been tossed around to try to find something worthy of a new generation and a new millennium. Now various proposals for Stonehenge are beginning to be formalized.

Designs for the A303 road scheme, including alternative tunnel options, are being worked up and assessed, with formal proposals due at the end of the year. A site has been bought, and a strikingly original design is being developed for a new visitor centre, with work now starting on its interpretive content. Preliminary ideas for a transit system leading from the visitor centre to the stones are being considered. Meanwhile an archaeological research framework is being finalized.

In terms of broader conservation, the National Trust has published a 30-year land-use plan for its own estate; while a condition survey of the archaeology of the World Heritage Site is underway. And defra has established a special agri-environment scheme, increasing the incentives for farmers in the Stonehenge and Avebury whs to take land out of cultivation.

Assessing progress

In its 1998 statement about Stonehenge, the CBA enunciated two overriding aims that need to be applied to all these strands of development - first, the protection and conservation of Stonehenge and its archaeological surroundings; and second, the furtherance of public understanding. So how is it all coming together? Are we going to get a Stonehenge that the next generation can be proud of? It is certainly not in the bag yet.

The proposals to bury the A303 in a tunnel and to grass over the A344, which passes immediately by the stones, are fundamental to the vision of reuniting the Stonehenge landscape. There has been much controversy about how best to treat the roads, and at the CBA's recent meeting about Stonehenge and the roads (see Update) it was evident that a 2km bored tunnel for the A303 is now being seriously considered. Compared with the nominally favoured cut-and-cover version, a bored tunnel is likely not only to have long-term environmental advantages, but may also ease some severe construction logistics. Any extra benefits that might be gained from a much more expensive 4km bored tunnel need careful consideration - but following pressure from the National Trust, icomos UK, the CBA and others, the comparisons are now going to be made in the environmental assessment.

Once the roads are removed, the issue of achieving more benign physical use of the landscape will become more pressing, and here the National Trust's plan, backed up by the new agri-environment scheme, is an advance. But, welcome as this is, it still seems anomalous that within a World Heritage Site protection of sites being damaged by cultivation should be left to a voluntary incentive scheme.

And what about catering for the visitor? Improving visitor experience was the main driving force behind the vision for Stonehenge, but the heart-searching and changes of mind of the last decade over how and where to provide new visitor facilities have hardly inspired confidence.

Improving your visit

Now - and not before time - the National Trust and English Heritage are beginning to develop a real working partnership in drawing up proposals for visitor access and interpretation. They must provide a coherent 'package' for visitors through the visitor centre, transit system and arrangements for pedestrian and other forms of access. The package must meet visitors' varying interests, different degrees of mobility and different lengths of stay.

Arrangements put in place must also respect the long-term capacity of the area to absorb visitors without damaging the fabric and setting of Stonehenge and its surrounding monuments. The latest idea for the transit scheme, which includes what amounts to a new small road for pedestrians alongside the line of the Stonehenge Avenue, is not promising.

So there is still a good way to go before a really coherent and sustainable scheme for presenting Stonehenge to its many visitors is achieved, and time is pressing.

George Lambrick is Director of the CBA

CBA web:

British Archaeology

Jan/Feb 2005
Mar/Apr 2005
May/Jun 2005
Jul/Aug 2005
Sep/Oct 2005
Nov/Dec 2005
Jan/Feb 2006
Mar/Apr 2006
May/Jun 2006
Jul/Aug 2006
Sep/Oct 2006
Nov/Dec 2006
Jan/Feb 2007
Mar/Apr 2007
May/Jun 2007
Jul/Aug 2007
Sep/Oct 2007
Nov/Dec 2007
Jan/Feb 2008
Mar/Apr 2008
May/Jun 2008
Jul/Aug 2008
Sep/Oct 2008
Nov/Dec 2008
Jan/Feb 2009
Mar/Apr 2009
May/Jun 2009
Jul/Aug 2009
Sep/Oct 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Jan/Feb 2010
Mar/Apr 2010
May/Jun 2010
Jul/Aug 2010
Sep/Oct 2010
Nov/Dec 2010
Jan/Feb 2011
Mar/Apr 2011
May/Jun 2011
Jul/Aug 2011
Sep/Oct 2011
Nov/Dec 2011
Jan/Feb 2012
Mar/Apr 2012

CBA Briefing

Fieldwork
Conferences
Noticeboard
Courses & lectures
CBA Network
Grants & awards

CBA homepage