British Archaeology banner

Cover of British Archaeology 69

Issue 69

March 2003



Tale of the Bronze Age barge sunk in Trent

Roman baths at trading settlement by Thames

Earliest evidence of medieval open fields near Cambridge

Mesolithic houses in both Scotland and the North East

Planned Bronze Age village found in Co Londonderry

In Brief


Rethinking Cursuses
David McOmish rethinks some old ideas to explain cursuses

Burial with the Romans
Alison Taylor on all the horrible aspects of Roman burial

Great sites
Anna Ritchie recalls the great Viking excavation at Jarlshof


Saxon zoos, copperas, and how long Britain stayed Roman


George Lambrick on broader history education after age 14

Peter Ellis

Regular column


Garrison Life at Vindolanda by Anthony Birley

Grahame Clark by Brian Fagan

The Archaeology of Mills and Milling by Martin Watts

The Roman Shore Forts by Andrew Pearson

Heads and Tales by Iain MacLeod & Brian Hill

CBA update

favourite finds

David Longley on his first undisturbed archaeological site


ISSN 1357-4442

Editor Simon Denison


Time to give schools back their full history

Archaeology could help restore a proper sense of history to secondary education, writes George Lambrick

Until recently there were only two countries in Europe that did not include history as a compulsory part of their school curriculum for children over 14 - Britain and Albania. Now there is only one, and it is not Albania.

Up to the age of 14, children in Britain are taught the basics of archaeology and history from prehistory to the recent past - and this now includes much more archaeology to enrich and enliven the story than there was 20 years ago. By and large, it is a success story.

Supply and demand

But what happens next? The exam boards for GCSE and A Levels operate on a relatively commercial basis, and they have been saying there is little demand for medieval history. As a result, the post-14 history curriculum is hugely biased towards the 20th century - the so-called 'Hitlerisation' of history. This creates an impression that the more distant past is somehow a juvenile interest of little 'relevance' in the grown-up world.

But now the authorities are beginning to realise that the narrowness of the post-14 curriculum is the weak link in history education that could kill the wider value of studying the past (see Update).

Relatively few history students go on to teach the subject, but there is always a need to enthuse enough of one generation to pass their interest on to the next. If the vitality and breadth of history are to be sustained, we have to maintain the opportunity for students to make broad period choices through all stages of history education.

It is sometimes said that the recent past is more 'relevant' because it is most immediately connected to our own lives. But this belies a fundamental narrowness of vision. For example, many of our most valued townscapes, landscapes habitats and institutions still reflect medieval and even earlier survivals, despite significant climate change and massive political upheavals in the last 500 years.

History and archaeology have the capacity to provide children (and adults and governments, for that matter) with a clearer perspective on long-term change - but only if these subjects are taught in an appropriate chronological depth.

We cannot develop a full sense of history, or of how change occurs, without an appreciation of the physical remains of the past. And we cannot properly appreciate our historic environment without a reasonable understanding of its historical context. Both need a proper appreciation of time depth.

Value of archaeology

Archaeology can make a huge contribution to history education - not only by broadening students' understanding of human society, culture and the environment, but also by providing core 'educational benefits' and career opportunities. As archaeology draws on more or less all the humanities and sciences, it enriches the variety of evidence and techniques that can be brought to bear on studying the past, thus making it more interesting and enjoyable.

We have plenty of evidence of the strength of public interest in history and archaeology - especially when the two are combined. Huge numbers of people of all ages from this country and overseas flock to major heritage attractions. BBC History Magazine has found that medieval history and archaeology are the top ranking interests of their readers. The hugely popular archaeological TV programmes such as Time Team are noticeably more multi-period, more multi-cultural, and better at conveying techniques for investigating the past than equivalent history programmes, which too often reflect the same obsessions as the secondary school curriculum.

These factors illustrate another facet of the 'relevance' of developing a broader approach to secondary history education. In an era where youngsters give more consideration than ever to career opportunities, the 'history industry' in its broadest sense is huge - and growing. There are opportunities not just in teaching and research, but also in media, publishing, tourism, museums, environmental management and archaeology.

Secondary history education needs to jump out of its box, embrace the historic environment, and recognise that the study of the past should offer far more than just a backdrop to current affairs.

George Lambrick is Director of the CBA

CBA web:

British Archaeology

Jan/Feb 2005
Mar/Apr 2005
May/Jun 2005
Jul/Aug 2005
Sep/Oct 2005
Nov/Dec 2005
Jan/Feb 2006
Mar/Apr 2006
May/Jun 2006
Jul/Aug 2006
Sep/Oct 2006
Nov/Dec 2006
Jan/Feb 2007
Mar/Apr 2007
May/Jun 2007
Jul/Aug 2007
Sep/Oct 2007
Nov/Dec 2007
Jan/Feb 2008
Mar/Apr 2008
May/Jun 2008
Jul/Aug 2008
Sep/Oct 2008
Nov/Dec 2008
Jan/Feb 2009
Mar/Apr 2009
May/Jun 2009
Jul/Aug 2009
Sep/Oct 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Jan/Feb 2010
Mar/Apr 2010
May/Jun 2010
Jul/Aug 2010
Sep/Oct 2010
Nov/Dec 2010
Jan/Feb 2011
Mar/Apr 2011
May/Jun 2011
Jul/Aug 2011
Sep/Oct 2011
Nov/Dec 2011
Jan/Feb 2012
Mar/Apr 2012

CBA Briefing

Courses & lectures
CBA Network
Grants & awards

CBA homepage