British Archaeology banner

Cover of British Archaeology 69

Issue 69

March 2003

Contents

news

Tale of the Bronze Age barge sunk in Trent

Roman baths at trading settlement by Thames

Earliest evidence of medieval open fields near Cambridge

Mesolithic houses in both Scotland and the North East

Planned Bronze Age village found in Co Londonderry

In Brief

features

Rethinking Cursuses
David McOmish rethinks some old ideas to explain cursuses

Burial with the Romans
Alison Taylor on all the horrible aspects of Roman burial

Great sites
Anna Ritchie recalls the great Viking excavation at Jarlshof

letters

Saxon zoos, copperas, and how long Britain stayed Roman

issues

George Lambrick on broader history education after age 14

Peter Ellis

Regular column

books

Garrison Life at Vindolanda by Anthony Birley

Grahame Clark by Brian Fagan

The Archaeology of Mills and Milling by Martin Watts

The Roman Shore Forts by Andrew Pearson

Heads and Tales by Iain MacLeod & Brian Hill

CBA update

favourite finds

David Longley on his first undisturbed archaeological site

 

ISSN 1357-4442

Editor Simon Denison

Roman Britons

From Mr SM Stirling

Sir: Martin Henig's article on continuity in post-Roman Britain fits neatly into the scholarly consensus which has emerged over the past 50 years ('Roman Britons after AD 410', December). The problem is that recent dna work at the University of London, and elsewhere, has blown the whole post-1945 revision of early Anglo-Saxon England out of the water.

The pre-1945 interpretation was quite sound. Work on female genetic lineages is still necessary, but as far as the Y-chromosome lines are concerned, we can now say with a high degree of confidence that the population of England - post-medieval immigrants aside - is almost entirely derived from a historically recent migratory influx, centered on what is now the northern Netherlands, Frisia in fact.

Since the Anglo-Saxons were not at a state level of development, we must assume this was not a swift military operation, but a prolonged grinding, mangling process - one which must have been accompanied by very acute consciousness of ethnic difference, and a very high degree of interethnic hostility for a very long time.

This is exactly what one would expect from the linguistic evidence and the written record, scanty though the latter is. Early Anglo-Saxon is a conservative West Germanic tongue, showing so little in the way of Celtic or Latin influence that a prolonged period of mass bilingualism is out of the question. And the written sources, including early Welsh poetry, reveal a hostility that is both deep and completely taken for granted.

This interpretation has been deeply unpopular, almost unspeakable, for the last generation and more in British academia, as anti-migrationism became a ruling orthodoxy. Yet similar DNA studies have, of course, shown that the Viking incursions too were a substantial folk-migration, not just a matter of war-bands and political takeover by an elite, although it was not on quite the same scale as the earlier Anglo-Saxon invasion.

The research is, of course, quite recent. Still, one might have expected consciousness of this information and its drastic implications for archaeology to have sunken in by now.

Yours sincerely,
SM Stirling
Santa Fe
New Mexico, USA
12 December

From Mr Ron Wilcox

Sir: I don't think that anyone would argue with Martin Henig, or has argued for some time, that Roman culture stopped dead in AD 410. In this respect he is tilting at windmills, but the end of the villa economy is a major change that must have had considerable effect on the economy of Britain.

However you compute the relationship between economy and culture in a society, this should surely have been taken into account in his thesis.

Yours sincerely,
Ron Wilcox
Bath
10 December

Martin Henig replies:

I have heard of the DNA work that Mr Stirling refers to, but other recent studies have come up with quite different results. One might expect some parts of the country that seem to have been depopulated, for example some of East Anglia, to produce such a result; but not others, for example the Middle Thames region, where there is every sign of continuity in agricultural practice with no regeneration of woodland or even scrub, and a development of mixed art styles.

Further, one has to explain continuities of the Christian cult at St Albans and Dorchester-on-Thames, and in burial rites such as 'decapitated burials' in central-southern Britain (page 14, this issue). Moreover, the Anglo-Saxon laws, with their clear exposition of wergild rates for different groups including Anglo-Saxons and Welshmen, show that we are dealing with a mixed population.

I am sure genetics will prove useful, but far more work needs to be done before we can draw even the most tentative conclusions from this source. For a start, we don't know enough about the genetic make-up of people in parts of eastern Britain in the Iron Age. It could have been the same as some of the communities on the Continent. We also need to know more about Danish migration in later Saxon times into the Danelaw, and about medieval population movements in general.

Nothing has been 'blown out of the water'. The evidence as a whole points to gentle development from 'Roman Britain' to 'Anglo-Saxon' England, and each passing year confirms the general conclusion.

Mr Wilcox is right to refer to the significance of the collapse of the villa economy. I thought I implied it in my article. After AD 410, it was no longer possible to lay a mosaic pavement, and it was probably hard to mend a stone wall. The currency collapsed, as we know. Nevertheless, cultural life continued despite these massive disruptions.


Saxon zoos

From Prof Barbara Yorke

Sir: I enjoyed Hannah O'Regan's article on the early archaeology and history of zoos ('From bear pit to zoo,' December). She writes that the history of wild animal collections in Britain 'began, it seems, with Henry I in his park at Woodstock.' However, it is possible that the history of royal or aristocratic zoos can be pushed back to before the Norman conquest.

Goscelin, writing in about 1080 about Princess Edith (d 984), the daughter of King Edgar, records that she had a 'suburb' of animals of native and foreign species in the nunnery at Wilton where she resided as a young girl. These animals may have been brought by foreign dignatories who came to pay their respects to Edith and her mother (the abbess of Wilton and a former queen). The description occurs in a chapter of Goscelin's Life of Saint Edith where he is stressing indicators of her princessly status.

The idea of exotic animals as prestigious gifts in Anglo-Saxon England may have been inspired by experience in Carolingian Europe, where Charlemagne had been sent an elephant as one of several gifts from the Caliph of Baghdad.

Yours sincerely,
Barbara Yorke
King Alfred's College
Winchester
12 December


Early industry

From Ms Mary Mills

Sir: In his reply to a letter about a GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceutical works at Dartford, Tim Allen seems to withdraw his previous statement about the existence of an early chemical industry at Deptford (Letters, October; 'The forgotten chemical revolution', August).

He need not have done so. Evidence for copperas in Deptford (and Greenwich) is well founded, going back to at least the mid-17th century. Although the Deptford copperas works closed in about 1836, it was succeeded on site by chemical works owned by Frank Hills who patented and made a fortune from gas purification processes.

I cannot argue the case for Deptford copperas before the mid-17th century, but it was clearly a long-standing works when taken over by the Crispe family after the Civil War. There is a dearth of pre-Civil War records, but I would not be surprised to find that it was founded considerably before this date.

Yours sincerely,
Mary Mills
marymillsmmmmm@aol.com
13 December


We welcome letters from readers. They may be emailed to Mike Pitts the Editor at editor@britarch.ac.uk or faxed to 01904 671384. They may be edited.

CBA web:

British Archaeology

Jan/Feb 2005
Mar/Apr 2005
May/Jun 2005
Jul/Aug 2005
Sep/Oct 2005
Nov/Dec 2005
Jan/Feb 2006
Mar/Apr 2006
May/Jun 2006
Jul/Aug 2006
Sep/Oct 2006
Nov/Dec 2006
Jan/Feb 2007
Mar/Apr 2007
May/Jun 2007
Jul/Aug 2007
Sep/Oct 2007
Nov/Dec 2007
Jan/Feb 2008
Mar/Apr 2008
May/Jun 2008
Jul/Aug 2008
Sep/Oct 2008
Nov/Dec 2008
Jan/Feb 2009
Mar/Apr 2009
May/Jun 2009
Jul/Aug 2009
Sep/Oct 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Jan/Feb 2010
Mar/Apr 2010
May/Jun 2010
Jul/Aug 2010
Sep/Oct 2010
Nov/Dec 2010
Jan/Feb 2011
Mar/Apr 2011
May/Jun 2011
Jul/Aug 2011
Sep/Oct 2011
Nov/Dec 2011
Jan/Feb 2012
Mar/Apr 2012

CBA Briefing

Fieldwork
Conferences
Noticeboard
Courses & lectures
CBA Network
Grants & awards

CBA homepage