British Archaeology banner

Cover of British Archaeology

Issue 70

May 2003

Contents

news

London graves descrated by Boudicca's army

Jacobite 'gentleman's retreat' at Glenfinnan

Bronze Age trackway and hide in East London

Evidence reveals peaceful Roman occupation of Scotland

How natives made money out of old Roman coins

In Brief

features

First humans in Britain
Nick Aston on the occupation of Britain during the Ice Age

Great sites
David Field on Europe's largest prehistoric mound, Silbury

Power dressing
Alison Sheridanon the significance of Bronze Age jewellery

letters

Roman burials, Saxon immigration and an elephant cap

issues

George Lambrick on the need for a National Heritage Act

Peter Ellis

Regular column

books

Mining in World History by Martin Lynch

The Past in Prehitoric Societies by Richard Bradley

Shaping Medieval landscapes by Tom Williamson

Novgorod edited by Mark Brisbane and David Gaimster

Raising the Dead by A J Stirland

The Geratest Killer by Donald R Hopkins

CBA update

favourite finds

Ros Niblet on an iron folding chair from Verulanium

 

ISSN 1357-4442

Editor Simon Denison

issues

A National Heritage Act fit for the 21st century

Numerous areas of heritage law are now under review. Let us seize this golden opportunity, writes George Lambrick.

Imagine - if you will - a family somewhere in rural England. The parents, now in their 70s, live in a relatively modest Grade II* Georgian house with its registered park. Their eldest daughter runs what was the home farm, which has a wealth of ancient monuments and cropmarks (some of which are scheduled), and some fine traditional farm buildings.

The eldest son is the rector of four conjoined parishes nearby. An antiquary by inclination, he chairs the county archaeological society which has an active field group and he acts as archaeological advisor for the diocese.

The other son was a bit of a wastrel at university, but has since made good as a property developer, with a diverse property portfolio that includes ex-industrial land, small plots in green belt villages and some run-down properties in the conservation area of the local town. He is a keen metal detectorist and has an extensive collection.

Complexity of rules

The youngest member of the family works for the Environment Agency as an adviser on contaminated ground. In her spare time, she is a keen sports diver and underwater archaeologist.

Now imagine how our fictional family's activities are affected by heritage legislation. The UK is unusual in having such a cat's cradle of cross-cutting strands of regulation through which heritage policy is implemented. Different parliamentary acts cover planning, listed buildings, ancient monuments, burials, portable antiquities and ecclesiastical heritage. Several more deal with the underwater cultural heritage. In addition there are laws concerning wildlife, hedgerows, landscape, agriculture, building standards and contaminated ground, all with significant implications for archaeological conservation.

On top of all this complexity, some provisions cover the whole of Britain, others differ across the country. Faced with such a plethora of regulations, our family might be delighted to know that virtually all the ways that heritage law affects them are now under review.

Following a series of high-level policy statements (Power of Place, A Force for our Future, and most recently the All Party Parliamentary Archaeology Group's report - see News), we are at the beginning of the biggest potential shake-up of the legal framework for heritage conservation that there has ever been. And although focused on England, much of it inevitably affects other parts of the UK.

The Treasure Act was reviewed last year and the Scottish Treasure regime is now under scrutiny, while legislation on illicit trade is in progress. There is a general review of designations - including maritime heritage - and another on consent procedures. In addition to a major planning bill, key areas of planning policy guidance (not just PPGs 15 and 16 on historic buildings and archaeology) are being rewritten. There is also a major review of agri-environment provisions, and another of environmental management for the sea. Last, but not least, there are various reviews of policy on cemeteries and the treatment of human remains.

So what do we want out of all this? Having rather fortuitously arrived at this unprecedented breadth of legislative navel-gazing, there is a real opportunity for sensible rationalisation and updating.

Look to the future

All these initiatives need to be pursued according to accepted principles for managing the historic environment - many of which are encapsulated in international obligations which the UK has either ratified or is committed to. Designation remains an essential means of giving special recognition to heritage assets that are especially sensitive to change, while planning and other consents provide more general-purpose controls.

But we also need a much broader framework of legislation if we are to protect the historic environment for the benefit of posterity. The responsibilities that all Government departments, agencies and local authorities have towards our cultural heritage should be put on a statutory basis, while greater use of fiscal and other incentives for positive management would encourage more proactive conservation.

Numerous anomalies in existing legislation, unnecessary duplications and out-dated exemptions, ranging from Crown immunity to the infamous 'class consent' for ploughing scheduled monuments, need to be rectified.

Our key heritage legislation was built up piecemeal, and it is now 25 years since most of it was updated. It reflects a far more fragmented notion of the historic environment than we have now, and has become such a rabbit warren of complexity that it is doubtful whether anyone fully understands all of it. Other countries have integrated heritage legislation. Now is the time for us to grasp this golden opportunity to create a National Heritage Act worthy of the 21st century.

CBA web:

British Archaeology

Jan/Feb 2005
Mar/Apr 2005
May/Jun 2005
Jul/Aug 2005
Sep/Oct 2005
Nov/Dec 2005
Jan/Feb 2006
Mar/Apr 2006
May/Jun 2006
Jul/Aug 2006
Sep/Oct 2006
Nov/Dec 2006
Jan/Feb 2007
Mar/Apr 2007
May/Jun 2007
Jul/Aug 2007
Sep/Oct 2007
Nov/Dec 2007
Jan/Feb 2008
Mar/Apr 2008
May/Jun 2008
Jul/Aug 2008
Sep/Oct 2008
Nov/Dec 2008
Jan/Feb 2009
Mar/Apr 2009
May/Jun 2009
Jul/Aug 2009
Sep/Oct 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Jan/Feb 2010
Mar/Apr 2010
May/Jun 2010
Jul/Aug 2010
Sep/Oct 2010
Nov/Dec 2010
Jan/Feb 2011
Mar/Apr 2011
May/Jun 2011
Jul/Aug 2011
Sep/Oct 2011
Nov/Dec 2011
Jan/Feb 2012
Mar/Apr 2012

CBA Briefing

Fieldwork
Conferences
Noticeboard
Courses & lectures
CBA Network
Grants & awards

CBA homepage