|
1. Introduction
1.1 This document prepared by the
MSRG sets out a research and management framework for medieval rural
settlement and landscape.[1]
It starts with a brief assessment of the current state of academic
knowledge and practical issues covering research, survey, conservation,
and excavation. This should be read with the Group’s recent review of
research in the decade 1996-2006, covering the period since the last
Policy Statement was prepared.[2]
1.2 The present document also seeks
to identify an agenda for future work which would fill gaps in
our knowledge. The final section presents a strategy setting out
priorities.[3]
In so doing the MSRG has had regard to policy statements prepared on
behalf of the Group,[4]
as well as to UK and national frameworks.[5]
1.3 We intend that this statement
will be made widely available and will be used in counties and regions
to develop a consistent and integrated approach to medieval settlement
studies. We hope that it will compliment and inform the very useful
regional research agendas that have been prepared for the English and
Welsh regions.[6]
We also intend that it should be used in making decisions on the
management and preservation of sites and will be helpful to those making
research applications. The statement was updated in 2007 to reflect new
information and thinking on the subject. The present document takes into
account recent work on rural settlements in Scotland and Wales.[7]
2. Definitions and Value
2.1 Medieval rural settlements
include all habitations from the fifth to the sixteenth century, from
the temporary shielings occupied by those herding animals, to the
residences of great lords. The great majority consist of farms, hamlets
and villages, together with associated landscape features, such as
roads, enclosures, field systems, boundary banks and ditches, ponds,
parks and woods, mills, manor houses, moats and churches. A high
proportion of settlements occupied by c. 1200 are still
inhabited, but some have been abandoned and their sites are visible as
earthworks. A significant number of late medieval settlements, and
almost all of those dating from the period before c. 1000 have no
visible earthworks above the ground, but many of their sites can be
discovered from cropmarks and soilmarks most clearly recognized from
aerial photography, from surface indications, such as scatters of
pottery and other occupation debris, and from geophysical or
ground-radar survey.
2.2 Medieval rural settlements have
been the subject of systematic research in Britain since the late 1940s,
and have been located and investigated in every part of Europe. They
must be regarded as sites of the greatest importance. Most medieval
people lived in the countryside, and here we can investigate the
material culture of the whole range of society, including those who have
left the scantiest written evidence. Survey work and excavation can
reveal much about the housing, possessions, and environment of peasants,
together with evidence for production, consumption and technology, both
in agriculture and in food preparation, as well as rural crafts and
trade. The distribution and layout of the settlements give insights into
social structure and social organization, and into medieval ideas about
order and planning, including the division between public and private
space. The constant and often sudden changes affecting rural settlements
– shifts of site, coalescence of small settlements into large villages,
the replanning, expansion, and shrinkage which affected many villages
and hamlets, changes in house form, the addition of elements such as
market places, greens and churches, and sometimes their total desertion
– demonstrate the dynamic forces at work across the period, not just the
general expansion and contraction of population and agriculture, but
many developments in lordship, politics, community organization,
commerce and household life.
3. Research and Survey
3.1 Research into medieval
settlements can cover whole counties or regions, or be concentrated on a
single site, but normally a study should take into account the territory
attached to farms, hamlets, or villages, and the estate to which the
settlements belonged, which could be large and contain many settlements.
The inhabitants depended on a particular territory and its resources for
their living, and their use and experience of the land should be a
dimension of any study, as should their relationship with higher
authority. But research should also look to a wider region, as
transhumance, trade, and contacts with centres of government and
religion took people out of their immediate neighbourhood, and villages
and farms will be better understood if they can be compared with the
types of settlement that developed near and around them. Since
settlement forms, building techniques and farming methods all help to
define the special character and culture of a region, so the study of
the wider context of settlements extends understanding of regional
frameworks. Recent projects which have shown the value of this broad
multidisciplinary ‘landscape’ approach to the study of rural settlements
include those at Wharram Percy (N. Yorks.), Raunds (Northants.) and
Shapwick (Somerset). These have all used a specific nucleated villages
or a wider area as the main focus of research. But others, notably the
Whittlewood Project (Bucks. and Northants.), have taken a wide sweep of
countryside and studied all settlements within it, together with the
evolving use of land.
3.2 Although it is convenient to use
a long period like the Middle Ages to define a field of enquiry, thereby
allowing research to achieve a depth of understanding, no period should
be studied in isolation. We must be aware that the landscape of the
medieval period had usually been settled and cultivated for millennia,
and that prehistoric and Roman patterns of land-holding, delimitation
and exploitation influenced their medieval successors. There should be a
similar awareness of the subsequent development of sites and their
surroundings in the post-medieval period.
3.3 Research should embrace every
type of rural settlement. The great variety of settlement forms deserves
to be recognized, whether farm, hamlet, large village or incipient
market town. (The conventional dividing line between a village and a
hamlet is based on a minimum village size of six households). In the
same way, farms, hamlets and villages which are wholly or partly
inhabited should not be neglected in favour of the study of abandoned
sites. Subsequent occupation will not have always destroyed the earlier
below-ground evidence, and the plan of streets and boundaries will
preserve the form of many earlier settlements. As the Whittlewood
Project successfully demonstrated, even in built-up areas and in the
gardens of existing houses, hand-dug test pits may be used to identify
earlier occupation. Local vernacular architecture should also be
studied: buildings from the medieval period should be recorded and
analysed in their landscape context, as their form and layout are an
important components of the medieval landscape; and early post-medieval
buildings can provide valuable indications of a continuing local
building tradition.[8]
Churches, guildhalls and houses provide invaluable evidence of wealth,
social structure and mentality at the community, family and household
level.
3.4 Lists of deserted medieval
villages and moated sites have been prepared by the Groups which
preceded the MSRG, and can be consulted in the National Monuments Record
(England) at Swindon. Much work has been done in listing settlement
sites in general in the Historic Environment Records (HER) maintained by
local authorities. However, some types of site (particularly farmsteads
and hamlets) are less well recorded than others, because of their
apparent ubiquity. As a clear distinction is not always made between
different types of site, so a long-term aim must be to enhance the data
in the HER.
3.5 Survey programmes provide an
important means of discovering new sites, and for increasing our
understanding of known sites. Survey techniques include aerial
photography, the planning of earthworks, geophysical investigation,
fieldwalking, soil sampling and documentary research. Each of these
methods is valuable in itself, but they produce the best results if
carried out in combination, and if they are applied to the surrounding
territory as well as to the settlement sites themselves. Survey is
essential for the preparation of site management plans. It is also a
necessary part of any rural excavation programme. And in the event that
a threatened landscape cannot be saved by statutory protection, a full
survey should be made for the benefit of future research.
3.6 Interdisciplinary research is
likely to yield the most satisfying results. The material evidence
should be investigated through field survey, excavation and analysis of
environmental samples. Documentary evidence (including field- and
place-names) should be studied alongside the material culture.
Significant advances in knowledge are likely to proceed from dialogues
between archaeologists, historians, geographers, place-name scholars,
students of vernacular architecture, and those who work on bone and
plant remains. New thinking will be informed by theoretical perspectives
in archaeology, such as recent work on space, perception, and on the
role of exchange and social organization in buildings and settlements.
4. Conservation
4. 1 The purpose of archaeological
conservation is partly to maintain the storehouse of information about
the past that is contained within settlement sites for the benefit of
future generations who will possess much more sophisticated methods of
research than are available to us, and also to provide a resource to
educate and inform the present generation. We must also acknowledge that
traces of the past enrich the quality and fascination of the present
landscape. It is the ‘time-depth’ of the landscapes of England, Wales
and Scotland which gives them their particular characters.
4.2 After a long period in which
many sites have been damaged or destroyed by the intensification of
agriculture, road building, quarrying and housing development, there has
been a welcome move towards the preservation of medieval settlements, in
part due to changes in agricultural policy and reduced pressure for
development. In England a representative sample of the most important
sites has been selected under English Heritage's Monuments Protection
Programme (MPP) for consideration for scheduling. These have been chosen
on the basis that the countryside is varied in its terrain and land-use,
and that settlement sites take on sufficient importance to merit
preservation if they are characteristic of a defined region. MPP has
devised a scoring system which selects important sites by virtue of the
condition of their remains, their potential and diversity, associated
features, documentation and amenity value.
4.3 The selection of sites under MPP
should not be regarded as a single act, but as the beginning of a series
of reviews. New sites will be found and new information about known
sites will enhance their importance. Advances in interpretation will
lead to revisions of the assessment criteria. We expect to see
scheduling as a continuous process, in which there will be a constant
dialogue between those implementing it and those advising, such as MSRG.
To take one pressing example, this Group has long argued that preserving
a site should not mean drawing a line round the edge of a village, and
allowing the destruction of the field system on which the villagers
depended for their living, and which we need to appreciate their way of
life. Medieval settlements are not ‘monuments’ confined within a fenced
enclosure of a few acres, but were the focal points of large living
landscapes. We welcome the new awareness of the historic dimensions of
the wider landscape implicit in historic landscape characterization,
historic landscape assessment and the specifically the preparation of
the Atlas of Rural Settlement in England.[9]
It is important that this is translated into the active management and
protection of the many aspects of the historic countryside.
4.4 One type of isolated settlement,
moated sites, has been systematically researched and a number scheduled,
but other forms of dispersed settlement – farms and hamlets – have not
been identified in a similar manner or assessed for preservation.
Considering abandoned sites alone, there must be in England 30,000
deserted farms and hamlets compared with the 3,000 or so deserted
villages. If conservation policies are to reflect the balance of
numbers, many more must firstly be identified, and then recommended for
preservation, together with such associated features as roads, field
boundaries, and ponds.
4.5 Perhaps the most difficult
problem for those seeking to preserve medieval settlements concerns
policy towards existing settlements. We all know that the great majority
of the settlements of c. 1300 are partly or wholly inhabited at
the present time. Many of the boundaries and house sites of
twentieth-century villages had their origins in the Middle Ages. There
are still features and artefacts buried beneath modern houses and
gardens, and even more within the occasional deserted house sites still
visible as gaps in an inhabited settlement. Every effort should be made
to retain the framework of boundaries, routeways, frontages and related
features which reflect the medieval structure of a settlement. We
welcome the work of historic landscape characterization and wish to
encourage its use to preserve the historic form of settlements. We also
encourage the adoption of medieval settlements in the Environment
Stewardship schemes and Heritage Management Plans.[10]
4.6 Conservation is also important
to preserve sites for educational purposes. However, at present these
visits tend to be confined to specialist groups who can best appreciate
the sites if they are guided by an expert. It is the view of the Group
that more sites should be displayed and interpreted for the wider public
to enhance an appreciation of the historic dimension of the landscape.
5. Excavation
5.1 The programme of excavation of
since 1952 has vastly extended our understanding of every aspect of the
medieval period. Before settlements were excavated we were almost
entirely ignorant of such basic issues as the size and shape of peasant
houses, and the chronology of village development. The few major
excavations in recent decades continue to shed light on these questions.
Sites, such as West Cotton (Northants.), Burton Dassett (Warwicks.), and
Wood Hall (N. Yorks.), have all produced new types of evidence, such as
major deposits of environmental material, and indeed new types of
settlement have been revealed, including the failed market village of
Dassett Southend. There are still major categories of settlement sites,
including villages and hamlets of the tenth and eleventh centuries,
deserted dispersed settlements of the Middle Ages; and sites in
under-researched counties, such as Lancashire or Kent, which have not
been excavated in adequate numbers.
5.2 At present only a small number
of large-scale excavations are taking place on medieval settlement
sites. To some extent this is to be welcomed as it marks a move away
from the destruction of sites by new developments and a greater emphasis
on preservation. However, development may also be seen as an opportunity
to investigate new sites and add to our knowledge. Furthermore,
excavations provide a training ground for another generation of
settlement archaeologists, and often provides a stimulus for further
advances in interpretation.
5.3 Such development-led excavations
must be conceived as part of a wider research programme of fieldwork and
documentary research, and treated as problem-solving sorties, often
focussed as much on peripheral areas of settlements, as on the centres.
The policy of preservation in situ and limited archaeological
intervention needs to be carefully considered. Large-scale
archaeological work, if thoughtfully planned and adequately resourced,
may be a more appropriate response. Meaningful results may be achieved
more often if the excavation covers complete farmsteads rather than
small parts of a single building.
5.4 Research excavation also has an
important role to play in the development of our understanding. The
value of long-term research projects which enable archaeologists to
reflect upon problems, develop hypotheses and then investigate them in
the field was demonstrated in the work at Wharram Percy and more
recently in the excavations at Bishopstone (E. Sussex).
6. Strategy
6.1 The information on settlements
in Historic Environment Records must be improved. The work that has gone
into the HER is of the greatest value, but there is much unevenness
between counties. All of them recognize a category of ‘deserted medieval
villages’, but many make no clear distinction between different types of
site, and have not attempted a systematic listing of deserted farmsteads
and hamlets, nor of shrunken villages. Each county should assemble
details of all such sites, defined by agreed criteria. This programme of
enhancement would require extensive survey work in many counties and
will need to be funded by the heritage bodies in England, Wales and
Scotland. But the problem of the still-inhabited villages, hamlets and
farms must also be addressed: those settlements with evidence (often
documentary) for medieval occupation must be included in HER. They
represent a high proportion of medieval settlements, and must be
regarded as potential archaeological sites, as worthy of recording,
survey, management, preservation or excavation as much as any deserted
or shrunken site.
6.2 Still-inhabited settlements are
subject to constant and repeated threats as there is often pressure for
infilling, the addition of modern estates, and absorption into suburbs.
We need to devise urgently, as well as the programme for identification
and listing of sites (see above), a method for judging how much
archaeological evidence these places contain, and a strategy for
influencing planning decisions concerning new development. Input to
local development frameworks, which often deal with specific
settlements, may be one means; another may be the use of Conservation
Areas for protection. Full advantage should also be taken of work
arising out of planning legislation (PPG 15 and PPG 16 in England; Welsh
Office Circular 60/96 in Wales; NPPG5 in Scotland), including the
systematic dissemination of information resulting from it, and ensuring
that Historic Environment Records receive reports.[11]
6.3 While recognizing the need to
extend the range of settlement sites in need of conservation and
research, preserving the deserted and shrunken sites, which contain
archaeological material least likely to have been disturbed by
subsequent occupation, remains a priority. Conservation measures must
continue in other ways: we should look for opportunities through
developments in planning and agricultural policy, such as Environmental
Stewardship to make sure that medieval settlement sites can benefit.
Conservation by agreement with landowners and farmers through management
plans based on field survey must also be pursued: for example, farm
plans prepared by Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group officers should
always contain archaeological and historical information and advice. The
aims of the MSRG can often be combined with those of other groups with
interests in conservation or amenity value.
6.4 Public awareness of medieval
sites and their meaning must be extended, by improving the facilities at
sites now open to the public, notably at Wharram Percy, Cosmeston
(Glamorgan) and West Stow (Suffolk), by putting more sites on display,
and by encouraging the use of imaginative methods of exposition, such as
the reconstruction of houses and settlements. We are confident that the
enthusiasm felt by visitors to deserted villages when the sites are
explained and their past existence evoked by a skilful guide or
audio-visual system is important in ensuring the preservation and
understanding of the medieval landscape.
6.5 Archaeological projects have
helped in a few instances to heighten public awareness of medieval sites
and the archaeology, and public-orientated projects, such as Whittlewood
have also enabled better recognition of local sites, resources and
materials. We particularly welcome moves by Aimhigher to widen
participation in archaeology through the Higher Education Field Academy.
This allowed school students to participate in the investigation of the
archaeology of villages.
6.6 The academic research agenda
combines the need to address recent preoccupations, and to take into
account new questions. We need to extend our understanding of regional
differences, and to assess the influence of the natural environment, and
define the extent to which people moulded the landscape and settlement
pattern to their own needs. The role of government, or lordship, or
market relations in forming regional cultures must be considered. For
the study of settlement, the origins and development of different types
of settlement and the associated contrasts in landscapes remain central
questions. After that formative period, the subsequent changes in
settlements, including their growth, shrinkage or desertion, are debated
but imperfectly understood. The household is a subject until recently
neglected by archaeologists and there is an opportunity to examine the
experiences of builders and users of medieval houses by the study of
building and settlement plans, artefacts and their distribution. This
field of research has the potential to throw light on such fundamental
issues as consumption and the family, including gender relationships.
Archaeological theory has played relatively little part in interpreting
the medieval past, but its application to medieval settlement studies
may provide new insights into this area of study.
6.7 The considerable gap in time
between fieldwork and final publication remains an impediment to our
understanding of medieval sites. Many pieces of developer-funded work
may only appear as photocopied reports or ‘grey literature’ and
knowledge of discoveries are not widely circulated, even among
specialists. Some major excavations remain unpublished a decade or more
after fieldwork ceased, and progress on post-excavation work on a few
sites appears to have halted entirely. We hope that the review of the
state of knowledge undertaken in the English regions and by the Welsh
archaeological units will stimulate further work on unpublished
excavation archives. The Group welcomes the growing use of the
Archaeological Data Service as a means for widely and rapidly
disseminating not just ‘grey literature’, but also older published
works, and encourages units to make greater use of this.[12]
6.8 The academic issues raised above
(6.6) can be addressed partly by applying new approaches and theories to
evidence already published, and by constructing new syntheses. There is
also a need for new research, and in particular for the type of
interdisciplinary, problem-oriented enquiry into a manageable but
extensive sample of the countryside – a large parish, estate or manor
for example – which has yielded such fruitful results in the past.
Previous work has tended to be based on nucleated villages and their
territories, but now work should be focused on regions of dispersed
settlement, or those with both nucleated and scattered settlements. The
techniques used in such research, and any site chosen for excavation,
must include extensive survey, geophysical investigation, analysis of
environmental remains, documentary study, work on standing buildings and
the use of every possible source of relevant information.
October 2007
[1]
The first version was prepared in November 1996 and this
revision was made in 2007.
[2]
Medieval Settlement Research
Group Annual Report, 21 (2006).
[3]
Frameworks for our Past, English Heritage,
1996
[4]
Preservation and Excavation of Moated Sites, 1983; The
Excavation of Medieval Settlement Sites, 1984; The Preservation of
Deserted Medieval Village Sites, 1984; Statement of Excavation
Policy, 1988
[5]
For example, Archaeology and the Middle Ages,
Society for Medieval Archaeology, 1987; Exploring Our Past:
Strategies for the Archaeology of England, English Heritage,
1991; English Heritage Research Agenda: An Introduction to
English Heritage’s Research Themes and Programmes, English
Heritage, 2005.
[6]
Cooper, N. (ed.), The Archaeology of the East Midlands:
An Archaeological Resource Assessment and Research Agenda
(2006); Glazebrook, J. (ed.), Research and Archaeology: a
Framework for the Eastern Counties 1. Resource Assessment
(1997); 2000: Brown, N. and Glazebrook, J., Research and
Archaeology: a Framework for the Eastern Counties 2. Research Agenda
and Strategy (2000); Petts, D. and Gerrard, C. (eds), Shared
Visions: The North East Regional Research Framework for the Historic
Environment (2006); http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/mol/archaeology/arf/;
for Wales, see http://www.cpat.org.uk/research/
[7]
For example, the Medieval or Later Rural Settlement in
Scotland (MOLRS) project in Scotland (Hingley, R. and Foster, S.,
1994 ‘Medieval or Later Rural Settlement in Scotland - Defining,
Understanding and Conserving an Archaeological Resource’,
Medieval Settlement Research Group Annual Report, 9,
7-11).
[8]
In respect of recording buildings advantage should be
taken of the opportunities provided by Planning Policy Guidance
15: Planning And The Historic Environment, September 1994).
[9]
Roberts, B. K and Wrathmell, S., An Atlas of Rural
Settlement in England (2000).
[10]
‘The whole of the landscape to varying degrees and in
different ways is an archaeological and historic artefact, the
product of complex historic processes and past land-use. It is also
a crucial and defining aspect of biodiversity’ (PPG 15, Planning
and the Historic Environment, September 1994).
[11]
Planning Policy Guidance 15: Planning and the Historic
Environment (September 1994); Planning Policy Guidance 16:
Archaeology and Planning (November 1990); NPPG5 - Archaeology
and Planning, Scottish Executive (October 1998); Welsh Office
Circular 60/96.
[12]
http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/library/greylit/index.cfm
|